The thing about Twitter as a site for discussion is that it fundamentally isn’t meant for it, or at least for any meaningful and nuanced conversation. But that won’t stop people (and sometimes me, I won’t lie) from trying anyway!
Anyway, about the topic in question. This all comes from the fact that someone had reposted artwork from someone who’d been outed for (allegedly)pretending to be black, being a transmisogynist, and making their Jewish of Israeli. Their artwork was, for lack of better wording, pretty ugly. And the question of why white people have such ugly art styles in an attempt to be unique was brought up. This question has been on my mind for a hot minute and I don’t really have a definitive answer, but I wanted to ramble about it.
For one: I think it’s interesting that people were saying that they pretended to like their art while they were active but had been so glad to not have to do that anymore when the person was outed as problematic. But I can’t lie, something about that leaves a really sour taste in my mouth. More so the latter statement than the former. This isn’t defending that person or their actions, I just think it’s weird to willingly pretend or force yourself to enjoy an art style that you find unappealing instead of just blocking, muting, or generally choosing not to engage with the person’s art. It’s okay to just dislike it, and move on with your life. If you find something ugly, you find it ugly! And that’s fine.
But it also got me thinking about people’s art being considered bad after they’re outed for being problematic in some way. While I think criticism is okay to be levied at artwork, in a constructive manner of course, I think a lot of people would be better off realizing they want an excuse to bully people. It makes me think of that artist who spawned the whole extremely unfunny “rendering process :]” meme on art tiktok a while back, to the point where people were making up shit about the artist to justify bullying them as hard as they did. You don’t need a moral reason to dislike anything, you can just dislike it. Bad people can make good art, and while I think they should be mocked for their actions and what they did wrong I just don’t see the usefulness in mocking someone’s art if it had nothing to do with what they did wrong? Maybe that’s just me, I don’t know. I can’t tell people how to and not to hate, but at least be honest about your intentions.
In this case, with the weird racist artist, I think it’s pretty apt. If you’re using your artwork to perpetuate transmisogynistic shit about trans women then you should be mocked for doing just that.
But circling back to that question which intrigued me so much, “why do people try so hard to make their styles unique, to the point where it ends up looking ugly?” I think it stems primarily from a lack of skill. I don’t mean that as an insult by the way, just objectively speaking. A quote that comes to mind in particular is “learn the rules before you break them,” and I feel like artists who do this break the rules before actually learning them properly. That’s not to say that I think every artist needs to study the fundamentals for thirty years before drawing or anything, but I think it helps to have some basic baby level understanding of anatomy before stylizing so hard you end up creating artistic monstrosities. Unless that’s what you’re going for. In which case, go right ahead!
Intention is also something to consider here. If your intent is for your artwork to be unappealing, go right ahead. Be my guest! But I think there’s a difference between intentionally ugly art on purpose and intentionally ugly art on accident, if that makes sense. Trying to make your art ugly while still having some understanding of what you’re doing in comparison to trying to make your art ugly while having no idea what you’re doing. And like I said, it comes down to a matter of skill level.
That does lead me to another question that was raised about this conversation though. Particularly this one.
You see what I said earlier about a lot of this feeling like “SJW/Tumblr Art Style” rhetoric? People trying too hard to be inclusive in their art style and all that, what a way to phrase a question LOL. But the answer lies in the same answer that I gave for the previous one; lack of skill, or lack of care.
The fact of the matter is that if you’re going to attempt to draw black people in some kind of accurate way you do have to learn how to draw our features. It’s not all that scary, trust me, but if you don’t put the effort into that you end up with a whole lot of ashy people with heat damaged hair that people usually do when they clearly don’t know how to draw black people but try anyway. For beginner artists, it’s not as egregious as in comparison to if you’re a very clearly experienced and skilled artist, and it’s as simple as using references and studying how we actually look to get it right. (But this isn’t even limited to just black people, I feel like it can go for most people of colour.)
See, I do have to admit I have a problem with this question. Because when people ask this it almost always ends up targeting people who draw fat people, people with body hair, darker skin, gnc people, or trans people who don’t pass. It almost never takes into account that people like that, y’know, actually exist.
Another example I saw and that’s worth mentioning is how the artist —- formerly known as puppychan —- draws trans men. He tends to draw them fat, being pre-top surgery, and in revealing and feminine clothing. Lots of people seem to take issue with that when personally, it was pretty inoffensive to me? People love to shit on artists who make their trans men feminine, or make their trans women masculine (although they’re not exactly equal since some of people who make their trans women don’t do it with tact.) and it’s kind of funny since in the year of our lord 2025 you’d think that we would be past the need for people to conform to gender roles. Guess not. But trans people can dress and present however they want, and if artists are exploring these differences in presentation in a good faith, I really fail to see what the issue is.
The word “caricature” often gets thrown around in these kinds of conversations but it makes me question if the people who say it even know what the word means. Don’t get me wrong, it’s entirely possible for someone to make an oc which is an unintentional caricature, but how does drawing gnc people, people with body hair, disabled people, etc. just living fall into that? For it to be a caricature it’d have to be made with the intent of parody or mockery, if it’s not doing that I just don’t see what the problem is.
That’s about everything I wanted to discuss. It could entirely possible that I take things in far too much good faith and don’t see the negative, oh well. If you have thoughts leave them in the comments, I would like my think pieces to have some kind of discussion with them! That’s it though, this is malik signing out.
p.s - alt title was going to be ‘Every so Often People Reinvent Tumblr Discourse But On Twitter and We're All Forced To Deal With it.’ but that’s way too long, that’s also why the first paragraph is that.

